America – Urban City Podcast Group

3 Historic Shifts That Rewrote Black Worth in America

Urban City Podcast Group — Thu, 11 Jun 2026 19:43:49 +0000

MAJOR TAKEAWAYS

• Enslaved Black Americans helped build the economic foundation of America while being denied basic human rights and freedoms.

• Following emancipation, Black Codes and discriminatory laws were used to restrict opportunities and maintain control over Black labor.

• The 13th Amendment’s exception clause created a pathway for convict leasing, allowing forced labor to continue under a different legal framework.

THE PRICE OF FREEDOM

By Felicia Kelly-Brookins• 2 min read

An Urban City Podcast Featured Opinion Editorial

PART I- How America Rewrote the Story of Black Worth After Slavery
There is a question America has spent more than 160 years avoiding, How did a people once
considered valuable enough to build a nation become a people so often viewed with suspicion
inside the nation they helped build? It is a question rooted in history and reflected in policy. And
it is a question that still echoes through courtrooms, classrooms, neighborhoods, businesses, and
headlines today.

For more than two centuries, enslaved Africans and their descendants were considered among
the most valuable commodities in America. Their labor fueled an economy. Their bodies
generated wealth. Their hands built fortunes they would never inherit. Yet, America denied them
freedom, citizenship, education and the right of humanity. Yet somehow, America never denied
their value.

No one questioned whether Black people were hardworking while the nation’s
agricultural economy depended upon their labor. No one questioned their reliability when entire
industries were built on their backs, and no one questioned their productivity when their labor
enriched plantation owners, banks, railroads, merchants, and businesses throughout the country.
Their labor was valuable. Their lives were not. Then slavery ended and something remarkable
happened.

The value assigned to Black labor began to disappear, while the stereotypes assigned
to Black people began to grow. The Civil War ended slavery but it did not end America’s
dependence on controlling Black labor. The emancipation of four million formerly enslaved
people created an economic crisis for those who had built wealth through free labor. Suddenly,
the workforce that had once generated enormous profits could no longer legally be owned.

The solution was not equality; The solution was adaptation. Southern states quickly enacted
Black Codes designed to restrict the movement, employment, and freedoms of newly
emancipated African Americans. Laws were written that criminalized unemployment. They
targeted loitering, vagrancy, movement and the very existence of black people.

Thousands of Black men found themselves arrested not because they were dangerous, but because they were
Black and free in a society struggling to accept either. Then came one of the most overlooked
realities in American history, The 13th Amendment. The 13th Amendment abolished slavery and
involuntary servitude, except as punishment for a crime. That exception became a doorway to
convict leasing in the South .

3 Historical Warnings About Dehumanization That America Cannot Ignore

Felicia Kelly-Brookins — Tue, 10 Feb 2026 20:07:50 +0000

Major Takeaways

Dehumanization is strategic, not accidental. It has historically been used to justify unequal treatment and normalize cruelty.
Language shapes policy and public behavior. Harmful imagery narrows empathy and makes injustice easier for societies to tolerate.
Ignoring history invites repetition. Democracies require vigilance, accountability, and deliberate protections to prevent old hierarchies from resurfacing.

Dehumanization Is Never Harmless: Why History Demands Our Refusal

By Felicia Brookins

The recent circulation of a video depicting Michelle Obama and Barack Obama as apes should have unsettled every American. One was the nation’s first Black president; the other, its first Black First Lady. To portray them in such a manner — and for that portrayal to be shared publicly by a sitting president — crossed more than a line of decorum. It entered the realm of historical warning.

This was not merely an insult. It was an expression of power.

Public disrespect is rarely politically neutral, particularly when it travels along the well-worn tracks of racial hierarchy. The message, implicit yet unmistakable, was that even the highest offices held by Black Americans do not guarantee protection from ridicule or degradation. Respect, it suggested, remains conditional.

Dehumanization is not the byproduct of carelessness or cultural misunderstanding. It is not a joke that traveled too far or a lapse in etiquette excusable by appeals to humor or free speech. It is a deliberate political practice — one refined across centuries of racial violence — that dissolves the ethical boundaries meant to safeguard human life.

History leaves little room for ambiguity.

The animalization of Black people has long functioned as a mechanism of racial control. During chattel slavery, enslaved Africans were routinely depicted as subhuman in both visual culture and written text, providing moral justification for abduction, forced labor, sexual violence, and terror. By the nineteenth century, pseudoscientific theories attempted to legitimize racial inequality through fabricated evolutionary hierarchies and cranial measurements, recasting oppression as biological inevitability rather than political choice.

Under Jim Crow, these narratives migrated into cartoons, minstrel performances, advertising, and propaganda that portrayed Blackness itself as a threat to social order.

Such imagery was never incidental. It was infrastructural — necessary to the maintenance of both individual and mob violence.

When a population is marked as less than human, empathy is no longer presumed. Brutality becomes administratively manageable. Indifference begins to resemble normalcy. This is why these representations have always functioned as alarms rather than amusements. They prepare societies to tolerate cruelty in its many forms: lynching as spectacle, policing as domination, incarceration as routine governance, and neglect as public policy.

Today, when these tropes resurface through digital culture, caricature, or coded rhetoric, they are often dismissed as harmless provocation or defended as exercises in free expression. Those who object are frequently accused of oversensitivity.

But the issue is not emotional fragility. It is historical consciousness.

Dehumanizing imagery tends to emerge most forcefully during periods of social change — moments when demands for equity challenge entrenched structures of privilege. Its recurrence is rarely random; it is the language of backlash.

For this reason, legal and institutional interventions such as Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion initiatives and affirmative action are not excesses of reform but instruments of democratic repair.

These frameworks exist to interrupt systems shaped by centuries of exclusion and reinforced by narratives of inferiority. When public institutions have been organized around the denial of full humanity, claims of neutrality do not produce fairness; they protect inequality.

Affirmative action begins with the recognition that inequality is structural, not merely interpersonal. DEI initiatives insist that representation, access, and accountability matter because cultural narratives influence policy — and policy determines whose lives are safeguarded and whose are rendered expendable.

These measures are not about preference. They are about confronting harm that has been normalized across generations.

To dismantle such protections while dehumanizing language remains in circulation is to deny the continuity between past and present. Language shapes social conditions, and those conditions shape who receives care, protection, and recognition.

When people are positioned outside the boundaries of the human, the moral imagination contracts. Compassion is withdrawn. Cruelty becomes permissible. Social indifference is recast as common sense.

Dehumanizing imagery has never been harmless expression; it has always signaled danger. It trains the collective conscience to accept violence — whether through public terror, institutional force, mass incarceration, or the quieter abandonment of communities by the state.

This is not a question of being “too sensitive.” It is a matter of understanding that to liken Black people to animals has historically served as a declaration that they do not fully belong within the human family.

Any society that claims a commitment to justice must therefore be disciplined in its language, honest about its memory, and accountable through its laws. Silence, after all, has never been a neutral posture. Too often, it has been the companion of injustice.

History does not ask whether we recognize these patterns. It asks whether we are willing to interrupt them.

The City That Built America: New York’s Legacy, Criminal Profiling’s Dark History, and the Evolving Power of AI

Urban City Podcast Group — Fri, 31 Oct 2025 18:30:50 +0000

From the streets of New York to the mind of a killer and the rise of AI

Sorry, no results.

Please try another keyword

by Greg Johnson" data-artist="Greg Johnson" data-trackID="" data-trackTime="27:39" data-relatedTrack="" data-post-url="" data-post-id="5939" data-track-pos="0" data-peakFile="" data-peakFile-allow="1" data-is-preview="" data-track-lyric="" data-icecast_json="" data-icecast_mount="">
View Details

00:00

Major Takeaways:

New York’s 400-year story shows how immigrants and innovators shaped not just a city but the nation’s character.
Criminal profiling has evolved from 19th-century speculation to modern data-driven techniques—yet bias still persists.
Artificial intelligence may promise progress, but it’s also straining America’s power grid and raising new ethical questions.

The City That Built America: New York’s Legacy, Criminal Profiling’s Dark History, and the Evolving Power of AI

This week on Viewpoints. To think that New York, since 1790, has been the largest city in the country, remains the largest, but there’s a reason for that. The timeless allure of this East Coast city.

Then… He speculated that he’s probably a very calm man because he was able to keep cool while murdering people out in the open on the streets. The rise of criminal profiling and why we’re so drawn to these cases. I’m Marty Peterson.

And I’m Gary Price. These stories in-depth this week on your Public Affairs magazine, Viewpoints. $5,000.

That’s the average amount of money people in the U.S. are now spending on gas in a year. Five grand. That’s crazy.

If you drive, you have to download Upside, the free app that gives you cash back every time you get gas. That’s right. You can earn real cash back with Upside just by buying the gas you’re already buying.

You can literally start earning cash back today. I use Upside every time I fill up. I’ve already made around $200, $300.

You’re putting gas in your car anyway. Why not get real cash back? If you like free money, download Upside. I’m saving the cash I earn from using Upside to help pay for a vacation later this year.

Download the free Upside app now to earn cash back every time you buy gas. Use promo code OWN to get an extra $0.25 per gallon on your first tank. You can cash out any time right to your bank, PayPal, or a gift card for Amazon and other brands.

Just download the free Upside app and use promo code OWN for a $0.25 per gallon bonus on your first tank. That’s code OWN for a $0.25 per gallon bonus. Stand at the edge of the Hudson River today, and it’s hard to imagine just what it looked like four centuries ago.

No bridges or skyline. Just open water and wild shoreline. In 1624, Dutch settlers landed on this coast and called it New Amsterdam.

Forty years later, the English seized control and renamed it New York. The capital of the United States was in New York City, something that most people don’t know. It was in New York City from 1785 through 1790, the Confederation Congress and then the first Congress of the United States.

George Washington was inaugurated as the first president in New York, the first Congress met in New York. That’s Sam Roberts, a longtime journalist for The New York Times and the author of the book The New Yorkers, 31 Remarkable People, 400 Years and the Untold Biography of the World’s Greatest City. Roberts says that many Americans, even New Yorkers themselves, don’t really know the full extent of the city’s interesting history.

Once figured out with a couple of demographers that as many as a billion people have lived in New York from the very beginning. Unfortunately, we don’t have a good record of the Lenape people, who were the first people who lived in New York for thousands of years before the Europeans came. But when you look at the history of the city, it is a history built by people.

The grid system, the system of streets, that rectangular grid that defined development in New York, the buildings, the Empire State Building that will always be the most iconic building in New York. Again, the Statue of Liberty, which all over the world became this welcoming symbol for immigrants who define New York. Today the city is home to more than 8 million residents and almost 40 percent were born outside the U.S., according to the New York City Department of Planning.

For so many, New York has long represented opportunity, progress, and the idea that if you work hard enough, you can achieve your dreams. Roberts highlights some of the stories of past New Yorkers who followed their dreams and stood up for what they believed in. One such narrative is that of Elizabeth Jennings Graham, an African-American woman who refused to get off a whites-only trolley in 1854.

Perfectly well-dressed, perfectly respectable, but it was a whites-only trolley and she sued. She sued the trolley company and her lawyer happened to be a man named Chester Arthur, a young lawyer who would later become the President of the United States. And as I point out in this book, she won her lawsuit in 1854 in Brooklyn Supreme Court.

And this was a hundred years before Rosa Parks. Her courage set a legal precedent and pushed the city into a new era of equality. And she wasn’t the only outspoken woman from New York to make a lasting impact.

Carmelia Goff was the daughter of Caribbean immigrants and championed women’s rights. She was instrumental in reviving a Brooklyn neighborhood that was a vast wasteland in the 1970s, East New York. It was just a bombed out section of the city.

And she, with the help of her neighbors, rebuilt that neighborhood, just like the Irish, the Italians, other ethnic groups did in the 19th century. She had the gumption, the guts, the courage, the energy with her neighbors to rebuild that neighborhood. And that’s what immigrants are doing today.

And immigrants have always done that. And they’re doing it all over the United States. And I think that is the spirit of New York, the spirit of America that I wanted to capture in this book, The New Yorkers.

And I think she, this woman, Carmelia Goff, is emblematic of that spirit and emblematic of the city of New York. While some New Yorkers come from generational wealth, many others come with nothing and get their foot in the door through any opportunity they can find. Throughout history, some of the biggest names in media, finance and other sectors have built their empires from the ground up in the Big Apple.

One of these titans is a man named James Gordon Bennett, who’s largely recognized as the founder of the modern newspaper. He was sort of a madman in his own way, but he really established what was called the Penny Press in New York. He knew what people wanted to read, and he gave it to them.

And what they wanted to read was news. He defined news about ordinary people, whether it was murders, whether it was financial news, whether it was gossip. And he built the New York Herald into a major newspaper.

In every facet of work and play, Robert says New Yorkers of the past and present are strong, steadfast and proud people who symbolize the resilience of the city. Whether it was the great fire during the Revolution, during the Brooklyn, during the brutal British occupation, whether it was through 9-11, whether it was the super storm Sandy, whether it was the flu epidemic of 1919, the recent pandemic. We have had the resilience to keep coming back.

New York remains the largest city in the country, and not just in size, but in imagination and opportunity. Its energy and vibrancy have always belonged to the people who built it, challenged it and refused to live anywhere else on earth. To find out more about this topic and our guest, Sam Roberts, visit viewpointsradio.org. For more behind-the-scenes, search Viewpoints Radio on Instagram, X and Facebook.

Also check out Robert’s book, The New Yorkers, 31 Remarkable People, 400 Years and the Untold Biography of the World’s Greatest City, available online and in select bookstores now. This segment originally aired in 2021 and has since been updated. Our writer-producer is Amira Zaveri.

Our studio manager is Jason Dickey. I’m Gary Price. This segment is sponsored by Capital One.

Banking with Capital One helps you keep more money in your wallet with no fees or minimums on checking accounts and no overdraft fees. What’s in your wallet? Terms apply. See CapitalOne.com slash bank for details.

Capital One N.A. Member FDIC. Coming up, how criminal profiling evolved from the streets of Victorian London to the databases of the digital age. When Viewpoints returns.

$5,000, that’s the average amount of money people in the U.S. are now spending on gas in a year. Five grand. That’s crazy.

You can literally start earning cash back today. I use Upside every time I fill up. I’ve already made around $200, $300.

Just download the free Upside app and use promo code OWN for a $0.25 per gallon bonus on your first tank. That’s code OWN for a $0.25 per gallon bonus. With Progressive, it’s easy to reach customer service with our app, website, chat, or by phone.

Because when getting help is hard, it’s not help at all. A little help, a little help over here. Thank you for calling bench press assistance.

What? Due to excessive gym volume, all available spotters are currently lifting heavy weights off the chests of other bench pressers. Seriously? Please continue to hold, and we will remove the barbell from your chest in the order in which your cry for help was received. Getting assistance should be easy.

With Progressive, it is. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates. At Charmin, we heard you shouldn’t talk about going to the bathroom in public, so we decided to sing about it.

Charmin Ultra Strong. You can use less, better than the rest. Charmin Ultra Strong.

Your booty pass the clean test. Diamond weave texture, it’s the best. Study up, teach a lesson on fresh.

Your booty pass the clean test. Yes, sir. Charmin Ultra Strong.

Charmin Ultra Strong with diamond weave texture. Cleans better than the leading one-ply brands, so you can use less. Enjoy the go with Charmin.

Most of us know the image. A dimly lit FBI office, corkboards lined with mugshots, endless red string connecting dozens of clues. Behind it all are a team of criminal profilers who are all part detectives and part psychologists.

But behind all the true crime podcasts and television drama lies a much more complicated picture. Rachel Corbett has been piecing this picture together for many years. Corbett is an investigative journalist and the author of The Monsters We Make, Murder, Obsession, and the Rise of Criminal Profiling.

For her, this isn’t just a deep dive study of a field. It’s personal. When I was a child, a man that I knew who was like a father figure, he was my mother’s partner for several years, ended up killing someone soon after they broke up.

And I was six years old when they met. And so my memories of him are really of a kind, loving, gentle man. And so when I found out years later that he murdered someone, a woman, his next partner, I couldn’t believe it.

It was totally baffling. And I got kind of obsessed with figuring out who he was, what was going on in his mind, how someone could do this unthinkable thing. And then, you know, of course, it’s, I come to realize, you know, it’s a very universal fascination.

What makes people commit the worst crimes that we can think of? In Corbett’s case, she talked to experts, combed through records, and put together a basic profile on her own. Still, none of the motives made complete sense. As much as I investigated Scott, the man, I never really came to any conclusions that were clear.

I looked at all the forensic evidence. I talked to sociologists about the prevalence of this kind of particular crime in this particular place. I looked at his childhood history, and I tried to profile him myself, basically.

And it didn’t really turn up anything satisfying. I left feeling like I still didn’t fully understand. And that desire to make sense of the senseless is at the heart of profiling itself.

Corbett explains how the field’s roots go back hundreds of years. I trace it back to the days of Jack the Ripper in Victorian England, which is when what’s commonly considered the first known criminal profile was written. A police surgeon named Thomas Bond wrote, well, he examined the forensic evidence, of course.

He looked at the bodies, looked at the physical clues. But he also decided to look more at the personality markers, the behavioral clues. He thought about, you know, what Jack might have been wearing.

He speculated that he’s probably a very calm man because he was able to keep cool while murdering people out in the open on the streets. Sadly, the person behind the Jack the Ripper killings was never caught or convicted. While this first criminal profile didn’t solve the case, it did change how investigators thought.

For the first time, they weren’t just blindly hunting a suspect. They spent time building an analysis and questioned why the person acted in certain ways. This small shift gained steam over time and transformed the art of profiling from speculation into one of law enforcement’s biggest tools today.

It took off in the 1970s when the FBI Behavioral Science Unit took off. I mean, actually, I should say the Behavioral Science Unit started when Howard Teton came to the FBI in the 60s. But in the 70s, as Ted Bundy was rampaging across the country, and soon you had John Wayne Gacy, and there was this feeling of a serial killer epidemic.

And the FBI kind of pounced on that fear. And they drummed it up actually a bit too. Like they exaggerated the numbers of murders that these people were committing, how many there were out there, how far they were traveling.

They exaggerated all those numbers. And then in the end, we’re able to get federal funds allocated from Congress. We’re able to expand their jurisdiction.

By the late 1970s, the FBI’s Behavioral Science Unit had formalized what had once been intuition. Agents began interviewing convicted murderers, documenting habits and tracing behavioral patterns in an attempt to predict who might offend again. Profiling offered a way to merge psychology with police work at a time when the number of serial killings seemed to be on the rise.

However, the media headlines didn’t quite match up with the national data. When you look at the numbers, there really wasn’t a dramatic uptick. There have been like upticks in these crimes throughout history.

There’s periods where they’re higher and lower and higher and lower. But this wasn’t actually anywhere near what they said. But they definitely put the cameras on these people.

Ted Bundy was all over the news. And it came at a time of the culture wars. So you had Reagan running on this concept of stamping out evil.

And these were perfect personifications of evil for him to campaign on. Suddenly, politicians all over the U.S. were campaigning on Bundy’s execution, like, I’m going to execute him faster if I get into office, and morbid stuff like that. Corbett says that Ted Bundy’s case blurred the boundaries between criminal study and public fascination.

This case captured the nation’s attention because Bundy seemed so ordinary. He was educated, polite, good-looking, and very likable. All of these traits shook up long-held ideas of how a killer looked or acted.

Even after Bundy was caught, the media frenzy didn’t stop there. He had a kind of remarkable trial. He escaped from jail twice and then represented himself at trial.

And this very, you know, got married on the stand. So, you know, he was quite a spectacle to watch too. So I think that’s part of the fascination with him.

You know, even the judge said when he was sentencing him for the murder of a 12-year-old girl, he said, you know, hey, partner, I don’t hold this against you. I think you’d be a great lawyer. It’s too bad you went the other way.

You know, I don’t have anything against you. Like this kind of weird, like even the judge couldn’t quite reconcile the man in front of him with the monster. And even decades later, this fascination with him hasn’t faded.

One similar recent case is that of the Long Island architect, who in 2023 was arrested and charged for the murders of seven women in New York. For many Americans, it came as a surprise because from the outside, he seemed like a normal guy who was married, successful and lived a quiet life in a quiet suburban neighborhood. He was an architect.

It’s like this, he was able to hold down a job. He had colleagues. So, you know, he wasn’t some like ranting and raving freak.

You know, he was somebody who blended into society, had a wife and kids even, you know. But I think it’s a combination of police failures, pretty catastrophic level. But also just that we have more technology now to track serial killers.

It’s very hard to be a serial killer now with cell phone towers and DNA and all the other things we can use to catch people now. Profiling has also evolved, but many of the old biases remain. Corbett points out that early profilers once looked for physical markers of criminality, like the shape of a head, a nose, a jaw.

They were often drawing from the same racial and class prejudices that existed in society at that time. Today, those patterns have been replaced by data points. Rather than facial features, profilers and algorithms now examine zip codes, family histories or social media activity to identify risk.

And while the approach has changed, the outcome can also be biased. In the book, I look at a really unsettling case of profiling in Florida, where they targeted children based on what their parents did. So if the parents were in jail or if there was domestic violence in the home, those children could then be targeted for enhanced policing as they’re growing up.

And of course, what happens is if you target somebody for policing, they end up, you end up catching them for crimes more often. Maybe it’s a little marijuana charge or they’re skipping classes, little things that get them into the system. And in the future, you know, I think the data-driven policing and profiling and with AI also is going to ramp up.

And I’d like to say that it would get better. You know, you get better data, you get better results. But it just hasn’t necessarily worked that way.

Technology may make profiling faster, but not necessarily smarter. Corbett warns that replacing human judgment with data doesn’t erase bias, but just hides it deeper behind code. As these systems grow more powerful, she says, the need for oversight has never been greater.

To learn more about criminal profiling and our guest, Rachel Corbett, head to viewpointsradio.org. Also, check out her new book, The Monsters We Make, Murder, Obsession, and the Rise of Criminal Profiling, now available in select bookstores and online. This story was written and produced by Amira Zaveri. Our studio manager is Jason Dickey.

I’m Marty Peterson. Viewpoints returns in just a moment. $5,000.

That’s the average amount of money people in the U.S. are now spending on gas in a year. Five grand. That’s crazy.

If you drive, you have to download Upside, the free app that gives you cash back every time you get gas. That’s right. You can earn real cash back with Upside.

Just by buying the gas you’re already buying. You can literally start earning cash back today. I use Upside every time I fill up.

I’ve already made around $200, $300. You’re putting gas in your car anyway. Why not get real cash back? If you like free money, download Upside.

I’m saving the cash I earn from using Upside to help pay for a vacation later this year. Download the free Upside app now to earn cash back every time you buy gas. Use promo code OWN to get an extra 25 cents per gallon on your first tank.

You can cash out anytime right to your bank, PayPal, or a gift card for Amazon and other brands. Just download the free Upside app and use promo code OWN for a 25 cents per gallon bonus on your first tank. That’s code OWN for a 25 cents per gallon bonus.

This is Viewpoints Explained. I’m Ebony McMorris. Have you noticed the cost of your electricity creeping up this year? You might not realize it, but this increase could be from artificial intelligence.

Behind every chatbot, image generator, and smart search tool is a huge network of data centers. All of this continuous computing requires enormous amounts of electricity to process data and keep these machines from overheating. While electricity costs are up across the board, towns near these big data centers are getting hit extra hard.

A recent Bloomberg analysis found that wholesale electricity prices in some of these areas have soared by as much as 270% over the last five years. Some policymakers are now exploring ways to make data center owners pay more for electricity costs so the burden doesn’t fall on residential consumers. Meanwhile, tech companies are investing in renewable microgrids, liquid cooling, and energy efficient computer chips to lower electricity use.

Still, efficiency alone can’t offset the expansion of new data centers coming online every month. In 2023, data centers used about 4% of all U.S. electricity, according to the U.S. Department of Energy. By 2028, it’s predicted that this number will triple.

The promise of AI may be limitless, but the U.S. power grid isn’t. What comes next is figuring out how to power this technology without overloading the system we all rely on. That’s a few points explained for this week, more in a moment.

Welcome to Culture Crash, where we examine what’s new and old in entertainment. Kevin Parker, the Australian hitmaker better known by his moniker Tame Impala, is a do-it-all musical guru who’s found a way to blend the pop sensibilities of Paul McCartney, a John Lennon vocal falsetto, and the psychedelic spark of Pink Floyd into a cocktail that fit in but stood out among the indie rock and electropop scenes of the 2010s. His 2015 album Currents is a classic among millennials, with tracks like The Less I Know The Better, Let It Happen, and New Person’s Same Old Mistakes racking up billions of streams across platforms and dominating Spotify-wrapped Instagram stories even years later.

Like all musicians, though, Parker’s output as Tame Impala is subject to change, and his latest album Deadbeat has drawn some polarized responses across the internet and from critics alike. Lead single End of Summer was noted for its more EDM-forward sounds, while his later singles were widely regarded as fun but less complex than some of his earlier work. And that may be true, but these songs still sound unmistakably like Tame Impala to me.

So yes, the album’s opener My Old Ways uses a head fake start that sounds like a voice note as a way to drop the listener into a vibe that’s more dance clubby than anything on Currents, but I disagree that that’s necessarily a bad thing, or that an artist should spend their lives chasing the high of their previous work. Parker is a husband and a father, as made clear by Deadbeat’s cover, which shows him with his daughter, and his new album isn’t steeped in quite as much existential dread and questioning as some of his past work. That’s probably by design though, and not a sign of creative decay.

A slower, more stripped back and bubbly sound seems to make sense for where he’s at in his life. Despite the polarized response, Deadbeat features a number of standout moments and tracks. I’m drawn to the romance of Peace of Heaven and the infectious fun of Dracula.

Tame Impala has evolved and Tame Impala will continue to evolve. Those albums still exist though, and his new phase offers enough infectious hooks and catchy melodies to keep me coming back. Will this album become a Tame Impala cult classic? I’m not sure, and only time will tell.

In the meantime though, I’ll be bopping along to Loser. I’m Evan Rook. And that’s Viewpoints for this week.

Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram to learn more about upcoming shows, and find a library of past programs on Apple Podcasts, Google Play, and Spotify. Plus, you’ll always find previous segments and more information about our guests at ViewpointsRadio.org. Join us again next week for another edition of Viewpoints.

America on Edge: Jon Meacham Warns of Political Violence and a Shaken Democracy

Urban City Podcast Group — Sun, 14 Sep 2025 17:29:21 +0000

Major Takeaways:

Historian Jon Meacham warns America is entering a dangerous period where deep divisions could destabilize democracy.
The assassination of Charlie Kirk adds to a growing list of politically motivated violence.
Meacham stresses America’s survival depends on keeping debates political, not violent

Pulitzer Prize winning historian Jon Meacham doesn’t sugarcoat it: America is in a dangerous place. Speaking on CBS’ Sunday Morning, the author of The Soul of America laid it out plain we’ve been here before, and we might be here again, but this moment is not the one we want to repeat.

The question tearing at the nation’s soul? Who counts as an American? Who belongs in “We the People”? Meacham says whenever that basic idea is under dispute, history shows violence follows.

This week, we saw that play out. At Utah Valley University, conservative activist Charlie Kirk, just 31, was gunned down during a public debate. By the next day, police had a suspect in custody: 22-year-old Tyler Robinson.

Kirk was no stranger to controversy. He built his name as a firebrand on the right, calling Trump the “bodyguard of Western civilization” at the 2020 Republican convention and blasting Democrats as plotting to turn America into a “third-world hellhole.” His sudden assassination now adds fuel to a country already burning with division.

And it’s not an isolated act. In just over a year, the U.S. has been rocked by assassination attempts on Donald Trump, the firebombing of Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro’s home, the killings of Minnesota lawmaker Melissa Hortman and her husband, embassy staff murdered in D.C., and a police officer shot dead outside CDC headquarters in Atlanta.

“This is not the America we want,” Meacham warned. “If we lose the ability to argue, dissent, and debate without violence, we’re breaking faith with the American covenant.”

That covenant, he says, was never about harmony — it was about struggle. About working through difference without turning difference into bloodshed. Think about Omaha Beach, the Pettus Bridge, Gettysburg. Those moments weren’t perfect — far from it — but they showed ordinary Americans pushing toward a “more perfect union.”

Meacham’s message for leaders and everyday people alike: Tell the story. Make the case. Remind the country what we’re fighting for. Because if the past teaches us anything, it’s that survival depends not on silencing opponents but respecting them enough to keep the fight political, not physical.

“Barely,” Meacham admits, we’ve made it through before. But barely is still survival. And today, he says, that’s the only way forward.